Plan, plan and plan some more

QUESTION: Is Stonewall Central a better name for the property?
UPDATE (click): 2012 Audited Financial Statements
UPDATE (click): 2013 Annual Meeting packet
UPDATE (click): 2013 Special Meeting packet

AUDITED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS ANALYSIS 2009-2012 (click): A CPA analysis of SOHO Central Condominium Corporation's Audited Financial Statements

The Fantasy Vision

Does everyone remember this among the wonderful ads and brochures and how about the salespeople and what they told us. I hear such fantasies continue. So after watching and remembering, cry and then laugh at the truth that is being exposed.









And, if the above is not enough and you need elevated blood pressure, here is the project's brochure.

Many posts are still issues and need to be read once again. At this main hub of postings watch for new posts and updates. Please get involved by spreading the word as to the issues here. We must document all that is taking place. Many documents need retrieval and assistance is needed in getting them scanned and posted.

Monday, August 26, 2013

Non-Answer to 17 Personally Sent Letters

Non-Answer to 17 Personally Sent Letters


All of the letters may be easily seen at the right on this blog page by clicking each link.

Many have already seen this 7-page "Open Response to George De Carlo and Ryan P. Reyes Unit 2114" from copies paid for by members of the Soho Central Condominium Corporation (SCCC) to our personally paid for 17 letters that are still not answered.  As we have stated, we have been relieved of a financial burden for greater publicity to our exposure.  The cost has now been approved and acted upon by the RAC of the Board of Directors.  This non-answer has given greater exposure showing the extreme faults of the managing of the building while announcing the online forum.  Actually, there are two main forums that are easily discovered for those who now know.

Their accusations of the meeting that I discovered by accident is not fully described but why should history be written correctly.  Speaking loudly for responses that have been refused since late November early December was needed since nothing else had worked.  They write "you claimed you wrote."  Is this trying to paint me as a liar?  Those letters were delivered and stamped received at the administration office for delivery to the parties addressed.  You write "We have asked the Property Management Office to give us copies of all letters you wrote."  Does this mean that once the letters were stamped received on various dates they were not delivered by Century Properties Management, Inc.?  If so, why are they still employed in the building?

We had given copies of all letters for the parties addressed.  These matters are still not answered and your declaration to "not engage with you further on the matters covered by your letters" is a perfect example of a lack of concern to the Unit Owners who are members of the SCCC.  Again, after delivery and time waiting many requests were made even my reading all the letters one afternoon in the administration office out of frustration from the mismanagement of the building.

more comments to come...



this will take time so more to come...

(Click here for a .pdf of the Non-Answer.)

No comments:

Post a Comment