Plan, plan and plan some more

QUESTION: Is Stonewall Central a better name for the property?
UPDATE (click): 2012 Audited Financial Statements
UPDATE (click): 2013 Annual Meeting packet
UPDATE (click): 2013 Special Meeting packet

AUDITED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS ANALYSIS 2009-2012 (click): A CPA analysis of SOHO Central Condominium Corporation's Audited Financial Statements

The Fantasy Vision

Does everyone remember this among the wonderful ads and brochures and how about the salespeople and what they told us. I hear such fantasies continue. So after watching and remembering, cry and then laugh at the truth that is being exposed.









And, if the above is not enough and you need elevated blood pressure, here is the project's brochure.

Many posts are still issues and need to be read once again. At this main hub of postings watch for new posts and updates. Please get involved by spreading the word as to the issues here. We must document all that is taking place. Many documents need retrieval and assistance is needed in getting them scanned and posted.

Thursday, December 4, 2014

Meetings

Meetings

Here is just one section of the By-Laws. Yes, no "form" required but there are the required details for the proxy request. Notice, too, that the proxy does not need a day in advance as the posted memos state. Yes, question and read everything very carefully.  Notice under Voting that one vote per unit is written. That is illegal. I had to point that out to the Board in the past with a Board member from the developers saying they did not notice it. Terrific, Board members from the developer who do not read the docs they imposed upon the buyers. The Master Deed has the correct votes a Unit Owner is allowed since this is a mixed-use building. Oh, there was an attempt to amend the By-Laws for correction. Of course, as many other issues we and others noted for the building, no credit was ever given. But, the amendment had a zinger thrown in instead of just amending the specific item. We told everyone to vote NO in case there was a meeting with quorum. In reality, no amendment would be needed since the rule as written is illegal and cannot be applied. It was applied at the 2011 Annual Meeting as well as a compounding of illegal voting having those assembled give a voice vote in unison. No such vote is mentioned in law. How would one even know how many votes were cast as required under law. This is why the commercial seats are held by an illegal vote. But what does that matter since rules and law are just written on a piece of paper.  The other seats at that meeting had no vote since the Board walked out without adjournment to carry on the election in conflict with the Corporate Code.
 
 
 

No comments:

Post a Comment