Plan, plan and plan some more

QUESTION: Is Stonewall Central a better name for the property?
UPDATE (click): 2012 Audited Financial Statements
UPDATE (click): 2013 Annual Meeting packet
UPDATE (click): 2013 Special Meeting packet

AUDITED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS ANALYSIS 2009-2012 (click): A CPA analysis of SOHO Central Condominium Corporation's Audited Financial Statements

The Fantasy Vision

Does everyone remember this among the wonderful ads and brochures and how about the salespeople and what they told us. I hear such fantasies continue. So after watching and remembering, cry and then laugh at the truth that is being exposed.









And, if the above is not enough and you need elevated blood pressure, here is the project's brochure.

Many posts are still issues and need to be read once again. At this main hub of postings watch for new posts and updates. Please get involved by spreading the word as to the issues here. We must document all that is taking place. Many documents need retrieval and assistance is needed in getting them scanned and posted.

Sunday, March 13, 2016

SURPRISE: New property management company?

SURPRISE: New property management company?


The following is a text by a broker finishing up law school who has been involved with a condominium building dispute. Not having a contract approved by the members was part of the injunction gotten by them in court. I also find the return of money comment very interesting.

"Condocorp CANNOT get mgmt company W/O vote of MAJORITY. Thats clear english in condocode/masterlist. Any appointment not voted by maj, invalid. Officers appointing such mgmt will be liable to return money of corp. If there is a need to get propmgmt, there should be a special meeting attended by majority, present the diff propmanagement offers, then vote on who."

So who will end up paying for this service contrary to the code? A new management company working for Soho Central Condominium Corporation and the Unit Owners ("members") did not vote since no Special Meeting was called. This would seem to violate the corporation code.

Posted by at

No comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)